Archive

Archive for March, 2009

Tory science antipathy makes front page, critics told to shut up

March 2nd, 2009

Today’s Globe and Mail features an interesting long feature by Carolyn Abraham on the state of relations between the Conservative government and academic researchers across the country. The piece captures the apprehension felt by scientists across the country, who feel that the Conservatives approach to research funding will result in decreased research budgets and increased brain-drain across our borders.  She contrasts the $10-billion (US) increase for basic research announced by the Obama administration in the United States with the $148-million cut to research budgets here over the next three years. Several prominent researchers are featured, including Drs. Charlie Boone at UofT, Gordon Keller at UofT, and Andrew Weaver at UVictoria, who suggest that the strategy of upgrading facilities while withdrawing the funds needed to run them is misguided. It is suggested that the world-renowned and highly productive lab Dr. Boone runs in conjunction with Dr. Brenda Andrews will run out of money in December. The ever-present spectre of leaving Canada for greener funding pastures is also raised.

Perhaps not surprisingly, the heads of the government funding agencies, NSERC president Suzanne Fortier, CIHR president Alain Beaudet, and NCE director Jean-Claude Gravel are nominally supportive of the government’s actions. The point out that some governments, including Japan’s, direct basic research funding to economic prioirites even more than Canada’s Conservatives. Somewhat chillingly, though, CFI President and CEO Eliot Phillipson explained that $600-million of the $750-million in new funding they’ll be disbursing will back competitions in which “there’s going to be a little more direction” from Ottawa. Other heads of agencies damn the government with faint praise, basically blaming the economic downturn for the cuts and suggesting the government has to make tough fiscal decisions, despite spending increases across the rest of the budget.

Most interesting was the characterization of the Honourable Gary Goodyear, Minister of State for Science and Technology. He suggested that his consultations with university presidents and research deans, as well as researchers themselves, have been positive. “You’re going to see that one person who didn’t get what they wanted… [but] eight out of 10 folks I talk to get it”, the story quotes him as saying. Perhaps the one person who didn’t get it is represented by the two officials from the Canadian Association of University Teachers (CAUT).  Apparently, Mr. Goodyear raised his voice, pointed his finger at them, and accused them of lying to their members and misleading them about how great his budget cuts are. Both sides agreed that the meeting was the worst they had ever had, perhaps reaching a high point when the minister’s assistant “screamed” at the CAUT members to shut up, before the assistant and the minister stormed out.

Brilliant.

Rob Annan Federal Funding News

Conservatives continue strategy to link science, commerce

March 2nd, 2009

Last week, the Honourable Gary Goodyear, Minister of State for Science and Technology, announced a new Centre of Excellence for Commercialization and Research (CECR). Perhaps not unconsciously, the name of the Centre seems to reflect the order of priorities for the Conservative government when it comes to funding science. The increased requirement for industry partnerships for grant proposals, emphasis on commercialization of research results, and increased investment by the private sector in research are outlined in the current government’s Science and Technology Strategy, released in 2007. The new Centre will include funding for Waterloo’s Corridor for Advancing Canadian Digital Media and Kingston’s GreenCentre Canada, with others presumably to be announced.

Goodyear also announced the creation of two new Business-Led Networks (BL-Networks) in Montreal. BL-Networks are industry-led research networks focused on “specific business research needs”. In this case, a total of $17-million will be given to the Canadian Forest Nanoproducts Network (ArboraNano) in Pointe-Claire and the Québec Consortium for Drug Discovery (CQDM) in Montréal. I’m not sure what forest nanoproducts are, but I bet $8.9-million will buy a lot of them.

Rob Annan Centres of Excellence, Federal Funding News

CIHR chair stumps for budget cuts

March 2nd, 2009

In a news release on CIHR’s website last week, CIHR president Alain Beaudet defended the Conservative budget cuts to research funding, albeit with muted enthusiasm. He repeated the government’s insistence that they have supported CIHR in the past, and trumpeted the increase in graduate student funding. He also soft-pedals the cuts, especially to the popular Open Team Grant funding program. In a bit of disingenuousness, he points out that if the graduate scholarships are considered, then CIHR’s funding will increase by $12.5-million in 2009-10. First, funding students doesn’t accomplish much if the researchers who would employ them don’t have operating grants. Second, the CIHR funding cuts are heavily weighted to the end of the three-year budget plan, and so the real damage to research funding isn’t projected to be in 2010, but in 2012.

Looks like the Government has felt the heat from the negative coverage of the research funding cuts, and is working to get its people onside.

Rob Annan CIHR, Federal Funding News