Harper, Clement and university leaders “grasp olive branch”
The Globe and Mail is suggesting today that the Conservative Government and Canada’s research community are going to share a “peacemaking moment” this evening, during a photo-op to announce the finalists of the Canada Excellence Reseach Chairs (CERC) program. Prime Minister Stephen Harper and Industry Minister Tony Clement will be joined on stage by more than a dozen leaders of Canadian universities, including McGill Principal Heather Munroe-Blum who said, ”It is a day for celebration … and a powerful symbol to the entire scientific community.” Tonight’s event will announce the shortlist of 40 proposals for the 20 CERC positions announced last year, which will be funded with a total of $200-million, or $10-million each for a total of 10 years.
A cynic might suggest that this event continues, and perhaps escalates, the government’s recent spate of making show of pre-budget cut funding announcements, in this case bringing out the PM himself to announce even the shortlist of a funding competition. A more generous interpretation, though, is that this represents, as the Globe states, “a chance for the Harper government to be seen as an innovator in its support of research, and for academic leaders to say thank you in a very public setting.”
Indeed, the university administrators seem to recognize the fine balance between being grateful and supportive of the campus infrastructure spending in the recent budget but yet supportive of their faculty members upset at research funding cuts. Tom Traves, president of Dalhousie University and head of the Association of Universities and Colleges of Canada says:
University presidents are well aware of the larger setting and we are concerned on behalf of our colleagues who look on the reduction of funding to the granting councils as a problem. The presidents would definitely like to see the reductions reinstated, but in the short term here and now the glass is seven-eighths full.
Personally (since I’m no cynic), I think it’s a positive development to see the Harper government engaging with university leaders, even if it’s simply a photo-op. This government has a reputation for ignoring its critics and controlling the message by excluding dissenting voices from dialogue. By inviting university leaders to be present at the announcement today, and by holding the event in the same hotel on the same day as the CAUT meeting where budget cuts to the research councils will surely be vocally criticized, the Conservative government is showing a willingness to engage with the academic research community. I hope the university leaders, and perhaps even a few CAUT members, have the opportunity to engage the PM and Minister and their aides constructively and open a positive dialogue about providing a solid base of research funding. As University of Alberta president Indira Samarasekera is quoted as saying, “I believe it is up to us [the university leaders] and the researchers to make the compelling case for the continued increase in this base”.






A cynic might also suggest that the CERC program is a perfect example of encroaching government influence on research since it prescribes a variety of conditions and selective areas for support. Since the competition excludes existing Canadian researchers, it raises the spectre of alienating the internationally recognized and coveted researchers we already have. The insinuation is that these are not good enough, or at best, can be taken for granted. Which begs the question, what is the point of spending $100 million to recruit 20 researcher stars to Canada if 20 Canadian researcher stars leave as a consequences of being overlooked?
What is this? Can’t they wait to announce the 20 winners! Since when do you have a party to tell that half of those brilliant people will not make it?
In the old days, you could make 3 elections with one piece of road, one to announce it, one to start building it, one for cutting the ribbon. Now this government of neocons does that with research. Even the creationist chiropractor stood up to announce the results of NSERC Discovery program last week, which should be standard bureaucratic procedure.
Propaganda at its best.
They will announce 20 nominations today. There will only be 10 CERC awards. The 20 nominations (cut down from 130) will be given a chance to win one of those 10 chairs by nominating a candidate who will then be evaluated by a committee. Half of those nominated candidates will not be funded.
Correction, 40 nominees for 20 ultimate CERCs awards. Still 50% attrition. My bad.